Wood Deck vs Composite Deck: Which One Is the Best Option for You?

IMG_2631-min-min

Wood Deck vs Composite Deck

One of the most important decisions you make when creating your ideal deck is to decide what material decking is most appropriate for your needs and wants. Wood and composites are two of the most popular choices. We’ll explore the benefits and drawbacks of wood vs. composite decking to assist you in selecting the best decking material, whether you intend to complete the project yourself or hire a contractor.

What Is Wood Decking?

Wood deck is used in a large majority of modern decks. The two most widely used materials for wood decking are treated lumber and cedar. For wood decking, hardwoods like ipe, jatoba, and tigerwood are also occasionally used. The primary reason people prefer wood is the initial cost savings, as wood is less expensive compared to composite decking.

What Is Composite Decking?

Composite deck blends plastic and wood together, to offer advantages of both organic and synthetic decking materials. Despite not having a natural appearance like wood decking, composite decking is more durable over time and needs considerably less upkeep.

Custom Designed Timber Carport in MelbournePros of Wood Decking

Aesthetic :

Wood decking has a traditional, aesthetically pleasing appearance. It offers a natural, realistic appearance, in contrast to composite decking stairs, which can occasionally look fake or unnatural.

Less expensive to install : 

Some kinds of wood decking are an excellent choice for homeowners on a budget, given that self-installation is affordable.

Simple to customise :

You can paint or stain your deck to match the colour of your house or to add more personality to your patio.

Pros of Composite Decking

Less maintenance :

People mostly pick composite or synthetic deck materials since they require little maintenance.

Less maintenance costs over time :

Since composite decking requires less upkeep, your deck maintenance costs will decrease over time.

Durable :

Composite decking is more robust than wood decking and frequently lasts longer thanks to the plastic it contains.

Cons of Wood Decking

More upkeep :

The maintenance of wood decks is greater than composite decks, requiring stripping, sanding, and staining.

Higher cost over time :

Compared to composite decks, wood decks can cost more over time since they require more upkeep.

Less durable :

Due to its greater susceptibility to moisture, decay, and discolouration, wood decking is typically less durable than composite decking.

Cons of Composite Decking

Less natural appearance :

Natural wood decking still offers a more organic appearance, but composite decking has improved significantly in recent years.

Costlier to build :

Laying composite decking often costs more to instal. Even if homeowners eventually save money on maintenance, the higher initial cost could be a problem.

Difficult to customise :

While composite decking is available in a variety of colours and styles, it is difficult to change the appearance of your deck once it has been placed.

What is the Cost Difference?

Generally speaking, wood decking is less expensive to buy than composites, especially at first. Although wood has a lower initial cost, composite decking often pays for itself after 2-3 years when the cost of yearly maintenance is taken into account. 

Which Requires the Least Maintenance?

To protect a wood deck from the effects of temperature, moisture, and pests, it must be painted, stained, and sealed on a regular basis. The only maintenance required for the composite deck is sweeping or washing to keep the boards looking good and holding up well.

Want the best decking for your home? Contact Big Azz Constructions today at 0417 535 032 or email us at bigazz@outlook.com.  We can help you with all your requirements whether it is for composite stairs or wooden decks.

LEAVE A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Contact Us

    [recaptcha]